Book XIII · Proposition 11
If in a circle which has its diameter rational an equilateral pentagon be inscribed, the side of the pentagon is the irrational straight line called minor.Heath, 1908
Book X names the pentagon's side, as it named the segments of XIII.6. The name holds for either sense in which the diameter can be rational.
Rests on: C.N.1, C.N.2, C.N.3, C.N.4, C.N.5, Def.10, Def.15, Def.19, Def.22, Def.3, Def.4, Post.1, Post.3, Post.5, X.85-90, X.Def.4
Depth: 17 steps of argument above the first principles. Parallel postulate: needed.
@proposition(
"XIII.11",
THEOREM,
sample=_rational_line,
note="Book X names the pentagon's side, as it named the segments of XIII.6. "
"The name holds for either sense in which the diameter can be rational.",
)
def prop_XIII_11(o: Point, a: Point) -> Out:
hypothesis("the circle has positive radius", o != a)
hypothesis("the diameter of the circle is rational",
is_rational_in_square(2 * length(o, a)))
corners = prop_IV_11(o, a).pentagon
side = length(corners[0], corners[1])
named = classify(side)
because(prop_X_21, Fraction(1), sqrt(5))
# The minor is a difference of two lines incommensurable in square whose
# squares add to a rational and whose rectangle is medial. For this side
# those are sqrt(R^2(5 + 2 sqrt 5))/2 and sqrt(R^2(5 - 2 sqrt 5))/2, and
# X.76 is the proposition that names their difference.
_r2 = len2(o, a)
because(get("X.76").wrapped,
sqrt(_r2 * (5 + 2 * sqrt(5))) / 2,
sqrt(_r2 * (5 - 2 * sqrt(5))) / 2)
# X.73 makes an apotome out of two *rational* lines commensurable in square
# only; the terms of the minor are not rational, so the appeal has no pair
# of lines here to be about.
claim("the side of the pentagon is the irrational line called minor",
"X.76", named.name == "minor")
claim("it is of the fourth degree over the rationals, so no rational line "
"and no medial one", ["X.21", "X.73"], named.algebraic_degree == 4)
return Out(side=side, name=named.name)